Business 21C - Published by UTS Business

Receive our MONDAY 9am Newsletter & more

Jul 28th 2011

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Not yet rated
Loading ... Loading ...

Creating sustainable growth

How can we decouple growth from negative social and environmental impacts, asks Anthony Howard. Like all big questions, this is not an easy one to answer. It can be difficult enough to find agreement on the problem we are confronting, let alone the range of solutions to that problem.

The Performance Theatre (TPT) is an annual event that brings together global leaders from business, academia, government and the social sector with world class thinkers to explore answers and encourage responses to big challenges like this. This year’s gathering was held in Beijing, in the context of the new 5 year plan recently announced by China, and against the backdrop of a nation which is confronted by, and confronting, the question of sustainable growth.

Four key themes emerged to run like a thread through the talks, workshops and conversations:

  • Foster authentic leadership
  • Innovate your business model
  • Ask better questions
  • Leverage our commonalities

Authentic leaders have done the hard inner toil to integrate their life and purpose with their work and other pursuits. They are ‘real’ in the same way we attribute authenticity to a genuine diamond, or an original masterpiece. Authentic leadership springs from within such a leader who both knows themselves and knows their people, understanding their strengths and their flaws—and appreciating that this is part of being human, not something that makes one better or worse than the other. One of their finest qualities is that they attribute greatness to their followers more so than themselves, and focus on creating an environment in which their people can flourish. This approach inverts the management pyramid, placing the CEO and management at the bottom, in service of those above. Attitudes like these create the possibility for new solutions.

“Business as usual will not get us where we want,” remarked one of the speakers, calling for a new business model based on human dignity, human rights, ethics and common values. Engaging with this observation creates the possibility for business model innovation across the supply chain, talent practices, supplier relationships and customer engagement. As Gary Hamel and others have noted, while technology has revolutionised the way we do business we still tend to run businesses, and approach people management, in the same way as our predecessors did. Business model and management innovation can create organisations which stimulate growth while using less of the world’s resources. Models that posit business at the service of society and the environment, rather than the reverse, are the starting point in this endeavour.

The only way to find better answers is to ask better questions. For example, with regard to people we can ask “who will grow and develop the most from solving this problem?” rather than the traditional “who is best suited to fix this problem?” GE asked this question when confronting a recall of millions of refrigerators with faulty compressors, and chose Jeff Immelt—who had no experience with refrigerators or recalls. Geoff Colvin of Fortune Magazine says Immelt credits this experience with helping him land the top job at GE.

Or “how can we as a business help society be better socially, economically, and environmentally?” rather than “how can we maximise profits and minimise costs?” Asking this question at Unilever created three significant ten year objectives: “To help more than one billion people take action to improve their health and well-being; to halve the environmental footprint of the making and use of our products; and, to source 100 percent of our agricultural raw materials sustainably.”

Or “how can we restructure manufacturing processes at internet speed—ie every six months or less, not every 10 years?” Haier have created the world’s largest whitegoods manufacturers by asking questions like these combined with innovative management practices.

One of the striking elements of conversations with people from other cultures is our tendency to compare—East/West, investment/consumption, rural/urban, conservative/frank, process/result, collective/individual, contribution/return, quantity/quality—with a consequent attempt to draw lessons from the comparisons. A number of commentators at TPT observed that a better approach is not to compare, but to collaborate, to find and leverage our commonalities. This perspective replaces us/them language with ‘we’ thinking, which is much more conducive to recognising a common humanity and finding common solutions

The challenges we face transcend national borders and directly impact future business success, since business cannot succeed in a community that fails. As such they require a new level of response from business leaders, particularly those who lead organisations which cross national borders. Personal authenticity, courageous innovation, deeper questioning, and enhancing common interest will optimise one’s contribution for the benefit of society, flowing through to sustainable growth and a sustainable enterprise.

Comments

  1. Hi Anthony, It seems that we have here - not a paradox, but a real contradiction. On the one hand people ask: what will we do to mitigate the looming global crisis in food, water and energy? This could be generalised to ask: what will we do to reverse the present trends to ocean acidity, land degradation, deforestation, cancer producing industrial toxins in the food chain and - now beginning - self-escalating global warming? Currently all of these trends show a ‘hockey stick’ escalation. Things are getting worse faster. Viewed through the lens of ecological sustainability, it appears that we have a self-destructing global civilisation devoted to economic growth. Since the physical manifestations of economic growth are closely coupled with environmental degradation - the more stuff the more degradation - the contradictions is between economic growth as currently constituted and the ongoing continuation of civilisation itself. Many would regard this as a strong and unpleasant assertion. To deal with it rationally, and not just respond with emotionally driven labels such as 'Greenie, socialist, demented…’ we need to be clear about what ecological sustainability actually involves. I think Karl Henrik Robèrt’s The Natural Step gives the best scientific reality-based approach to understanding ecological sustainability. The short version would be that an ecologically sustainable society will not use nature's resources faster than they can replenish or regenerate. One example is the depleting water tables that both cities and agriculture depend on in many areas. It is not hard to see that what is happening with water is simply one example of a much larger trend. For decades now World Watch Institute's State of the World reports have chronicled accumulating environmental degradation. The Stockholm Resilience Institute shows that we are over the red line in key areas. And Overburdening Australia spells out the resource and environmental implications for we Australians. Conclusion? In today's world "sustainable growth" is an oxymoron. It is understandable that a global forum of business leaders would not be talking about intentionally slowing growth in order to transition to a civilisation that works within the earth ecological parameters. But they should. Or at least they should be investigating whether the assertions of the 'environmental doomsayers’ have some truth in them, and mentally testing whether proposed solutions to becoming 'more sustainable' (another oxymoron) will be sufficient. As responsible people, we should all be doing this, of course. I have done my homework, and my conclusions are evident here. My response has been to form Transform Australia, a new group devoted to healthy whole system change such that we become an ecologically sustainable and socially healthy society that is pleasurable for most to live in. Cheers, Andrew
  2. Anthony says:
    Hello Andrew, and thank you for taking the time to comment so extensively. I don't agree that enquiring what can be done to mitigate a looming crisis in food water and energy is equivalent to asking what can be done to reverse a range of negative environmental impacts, although I do agree that these are inexorably linked. Your reference that "an ecologically sustainable society will not use nature's resources faster than they can replenish or regenerate" is well made and the crux of the issue, although I don't agree that growth necessarily implies consumption at a greater rate than is sensible or possible, and hence do not agree that 'sustainable growth' is an oxymoron. 'Sustainable growth' is the very challenge we are confronting, and one that many many leaders are very concerned about. Contrary to the stereotype of rapacious, money driven individuals who care little for others, the vast majority of leaders I know are deeply concerned about the world we all inhabit, share the same concerns as you, want to limit excessive consumption as one aid to limiting growth, and are very committed to systemic change. They too aspire to an ecologically sustainable and socially healthy society. I rather suspect most people have the same desires for a wonderful world and a wonderful life, but we need to spend more time listening to one another so we can gain insight and understanding, and leverage our commonalities, rather than argue over our differences. Good luck with what you are trying to do with Transform Australia. Warm regards, Anthony
  3. Geraldine Coy says:
    Anthony, thank you so much for sending this through. I could not agree with you more. The overriding necessity for the four themes identified by you , is that leadership needs courage. I think that as we have progessed in the world of analytics, evaluation and the fostering of risk management frameworks, we have been "nursed" into an environment of overwhelming fear. We are discouraged from taking any risks, which suffocates innovation by definition, we don't ask the right questions for fear that the answers might expose us and we focus on our differences by way of judgement (to gain the upper hand), rather than our commonalities which could potentially generate better solutions to problems. We'll defer the decisions until we have all the "facts", but instead, the opportunities will fly on by. Oh dear, I do sound cynical! Really, I recall the joy of finding truly authentic leaders rising out of tthe ashes of great strife in the world, and am saddened by the apparent lack of top class leadership in our world today. I think your article is on the button! Warm Regards, Geraldine
  4. Anthony, thanks for sending this through .... these are difficult questions -and apt for our challenging times. Courageous leaders who are willing to think longterm and solve problems rather than fix the symptoms are far and few - and that in itself creates a glut for mentors and role models. However, this is the opportunity for leaders to forge a new approach, to be innovative and creative. Like you, I believe there are many with the intent for sustainable growth. Perhaps it is time for them to be vulnerable: fail fast, fail frequently, fix it for now .... and through these mini learning steps find they have created momentum towards their intent. Also, they are not alone - collaborative partnerships are the way to go. Your article, Anthony, has asked the right questions and gotten us thinking. Now it's time for some action. Let's go! Yvonne
  5. Peter Nochar says:
    Anthony I enjoyed this, it is indeed food for thought and reflection. In particular I liked the label 'Authentic Leadership' because it encapsulates well a humanistic insight to management which is sometimes overlooked for 'hard skills'. The qualities of knowing self and the team around you, attributing greatness to others, coupled to the reverse pyramid about serving employees is not all new but is commonly overlooked and very powerful if done authentically and consistently. The 'better questions' paragraph with those great examples from GE and Unilever again reminds me that simple is best and that uncluttered thinking opens doors to new and unexplored territory. For all of us working in ambiguity is the new normal and the speed of change is constantly increasing. The old normal is simply old, doing something, being trusting of spontaneity and encouraging others around you to be secure in this environment is what will unlock progress and prosperity.
  6. Malcolm Durham says:
    It is inspiring to find this happening but hard to see how it will ebcome reality. It provokes, in me, 2 further questions: 1. Where are the leaders to whom you refer? You say that business leaders want these things but you don't name them and I don't see them. Here in the UK those that are lauded are often dysfunctional and rapacious. The TV programme Dragon's Den fosters this image. 2. If these leaders were to emerge would they get elected? Most people don't see themselves as greedy or rapacious but as fulfilling their basic needs. I think that one of their needs is to be safe and safety ius currently seen as wealthy enough to survive. Governments only prosper when they meet these needs. As Clinton's adviser said "It's the economy stupid" In order to make the change you seek requires deep inspiring, shaming even, leadership that shows the error of our ways: a Gandhi for the modern western world, a Dalai Lama for Europe, a Jesus to turn the money lenders out of the temple. Any volunteers?
  7. Ruth McCance says:
    This is an excellent 'pithy' (love the word) and useful synopsis of focus points to find solutions to the issues of global sustainability. My thinking is that, before these strategies become effective, we need to establish alignment around the existence and significance of the actual problems themselves. This is complex as what makes sense at a macro global level and what makes sense at a local/micro level can be very different. I think the starting point rests with each of us and the conversations all of us can have right now. This includes the easy ones with people who agree with us and the harder ones with those who disagree or are remote from us. So my question to myself is 'how do I show authentic leadership and ask the intelligent questions so that can become a prompt to others'. Not an easy question and certainly not one I'm confidently answering just yet..however, as you point out Anthony, the asking is the important first step!

Related Material