Business 21C - Published by UTS Business

Receive our MONDAY 9am Newsletter & more

Jul 10th 2010

Back to Latest Posts
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Not yet rated
Loading ... Loading ...

iMania or iFad?

From guest blogger Gabriella Lahti

On the day of the iPad launch, there was a special feeling in the air. Excitement, frustration, happiness, desperation. The people outside the Apple Store all wanted to have it, to be a part of the family. Did people know whether the iPad was great or not before they lined up outside the store?

Probably not, but they believed in it. Just like lining up to receive the Lord’s Supper in church, they believed in it.

A great example of consumerism, triggered by a belief, a want, to be a part of something bigger and to be a member of the family, the iFamily.

The fear of being an outsider is more powerful than the fear of spending your whole salary on an iPad.

We have all heard it all before, but it could be healthy to go through this again:

What do these products give us, more than the thousands of applications and the access to the internet? Why do we need so many of Apple’s products and who would we be without them? Is that a scary thought?

Three years ago, Apple’s iPhone had not yet arrived on the market. The iPad was just a rumour. Since then, Apple has been spewing out new products; skinnier, smaller and with better quality each year. At least we keep telling ourselves that.

Steve Jobs gets skinnier too, you know.

Despite undergoing a liver transpant last year, Apple’s Chief Executive Officer, Steve Jobs, has frequently attended conferences, interviews and seminars to talk about new Apple products.

About a month ago at the Wall Street Journal’s D: All things Digital (D8) conference, Jobs said:

‘Apple is a company that (…) doesn’t have the most resources of everybody in the world and the way we succeeded is by choosing what horses to ride really carefully.’

He further explained that Apple’s goal is always to choose the technology that has a future.

‘If you choose wisely, you can save yourself an enormous amount of work, verses trying to do everything”, he said.

Jobs explained why Apple decided to not allow Flash on iPhones, iPods and iPads, saying it didn’t matter that 75 percent of the video on the internet was available in Flash because Flash ‘looks like a technology that had its day’.

Jobs said he was only interesting in creating products people would think were great, such as the iPad.

‘We are trying to make great products for people. So far I have to say that people seem to be liking iPads. We sold one every three seconds since we launched it’, Jobs said enthusiastically. This is Steve Jobs doing what he what he does best; he makes choices. With the iPad, he decided to save himself an enormous amount of work, verses trying to do everything, and called the iPad a great product. It was a great product and everyone needed one.

And so we swallowed the Lord’s Supper; opened our wallets and paid. At the D8 conference, Jobs said this about the future:

‘PCs are going to be like trucks. They are still going to be around. They are still going to have a lot of value… but they’re just going to be used by one out of x people.’

But I think Jobs forgot something. Jobs is not God, he is just a worm inside of an apple, eating his way through life.

As much as the people right now seem to be in some sort of hypnotised iMania mode, evolution is always going to be a fact. Sooner, rather than later, there will be a new competitor in the market who also knows which horses to ride.

A competitor who remembers the fact that people get bored easily and are drawn to new looks, feelings, flavours. Things we need and want… things to believe in.

Plus we all know, eating a rotten apple gives you a stomach ache.

Gabriella Lahti is the producer of Business21c Weekly, our regular business podcast. She is studying a Masters in Journalism at the University of Technology.

Comments

  1. Good article Gabriella, thanks for posting. While a worthy competitor may appear soon, most likely Google with Android / Chrome or HP with whatever they do with WebOS, it would be hard to see Apple being knocked off their pedestal in the near future. Regardless of the worthiness of the iPad as a product people really need, I think the strength of Apple's ENTIRE product line is very important to consider. They have one of the best laptops in the MacBook Pro (go to any tech conference and count the number of Apple logos surrounded by aluminium), they have only recently released one of the best all-in-ones (the 27 inch iMac is a stunner), and the iPhone 4 looks like it will be the best selling iPhone yet, despite some significant teething problems. If the iPad fails, Apple continues to be strong - indeed, it seems Apple waited until they were strong enough to release a fairly risky new category of product. The software is also crucial. No other company really has anything that integrates all these devices as well as iTunes does (despite its rather meaningless name today, it's more like an iHub or something). And then there's WebKit, Apple's browser technology, which is entrenched in the mobile space (Apple, Google, Nokia, and RIM all use it), while being one of the finest browser engines on the desktop as well (Safari, and the increasingly-loved Chrome browser). Apple's retail stores (shrines?) continue to amaze as well: the new Shanghai store is rather incredible: http://shanghaiist.com/2010/07/08/preview_shanghais_first_apple_store.php The point about Steve Jobs health is certainly important, but even this is becoming less relevant. As long as Jonathon Ive remains at Apple, they will continue to design beautiful products, and Tim Cook impressed the business community as a worthy leader in Steve Jobs' absence. Sorry if this sounds like a fanboy rant, which it most certainly is, but I guess my point is that today the roots of the Apple tree are very deep, even if they have brainwashed so many people with exceptional marketing :)
  2. Scott David says:
    I fully agree with Travis, that Apple is important and revered due to a beautifully integrated suite of products and software. But I think a key factor for the success and future of the iPad is that everyone can feel how content consumption is changing forever. New types of devices have to fill the void where paper once was, and extend the potential way beyond it. Amazon's Kindle has made a significant step in that direction, but that's a digital book not an interactive content device. Barnes & Noble's Nook is somewhere between. The iPad sits at the sweet spot for our short attention span media consumption, clad in a fantastic design, and hints at the future. Of course people want to buy that.

Related Material