Posts Tagged ‘Consumer behaviour’

Edition 46 – The business of organic produce

Sunday, March 20th, 2011

Business21C Weekly is available through the iTunes Podcast directory. To subscribe directly via iTunes, go to the Advanced menu in iTunes and select Subscribe to Podcast. Then paste in the following URL: http://www.business21c.com.au/podcasts/feed

Business21C Weekly is broadcast on Sydney’s 2SER 107.3 fm radio station at 9:00 am each Monday morning.

Organic, what does it mean, and what does it matter?

Over the past five years, organic produce has moved out of the specialist stores, onto supermarket shelves and to the trestle tables of a farmers’ market near you. Output has doubled and looks set to keep growing. But do we always know what we’re buying when we buy organic? And is an organic food industry viable as the world’s population growth moves towards 9 billion and competition for farming land comes under more and more pressure?

This week, Business21C Weekly takes a look at organic farming in Australia.

We talk to Eric Love, Chair of the Centre for Organic and Resource Enterprises about the issues, the costs, the ethics and the future of the industry. And to organic farmer Catherine Ford, from her macadamia and coffee plantation on the New South Wales north coast.

Edition 35: Best of 2010 – The business of news

Monday, January 3rd, 2011

Business21C Weekly is now available through the iTunes Podcast directory. To subscribe directly via iTunes, go to the Advanced menu in iTunes and select Subscribe to Podcast. Then paste in the following URL: http://www.business21c.com.au/podcasts/feed

Business21C Weekly is broadcast on Sydney’s 2SER 107.3 fm radio station at 9:00 am each Monday morning.

For this summer edition we are going to play a best of 2010 for Business21C Weekly. Today is the second and last “best of 2010″ with a repeat of  ’The business of news’:

This edition of Business21c Weekly looks at the business of news, as bloggers-in-pyjamas take on the might of the global media empires, as News Limited launches its paywall experiment at the Sunday Times, as iPad sales top two million worldwide, and its first look-alike challenger the iped is released in China – identical but at a fifth of the cost.

The news media landscape is a laboratory of experiments. The question isn’t simply who is making the news, but who is making money from news, and how? And how do we know whom we can trust?

Our guest is career journalist Tony Maniaty, veteran international reporter of conflict and crisis from East Timor to Lithuania. Tony is a Senior Lecturer in International Journalism at UTS and member of the advisory board of the Australian Centre for Independent Journalism.

Is it a David and Goliath contest? Or is there truly room for all, gatekeepers and gatecrashers, to meet our ever-expanding, but ever more fragmented demand for news, information and entertainment?

Sentiment analysis: the internet becomes a focus group

Sunday, October 31st, 2010

How does the world feel right now? In 2005 wefeelfine.org scoured the world’s blogs for the keyword ‘feel’ and, via an artful and compelling interface, presented each author’s snippets of text and images as a beautiful representation of the mood of the world. Jump forwards to April 2010 when 50,000 websites integrated Facebook ‘Like’ buttons in the first week of its availability. Now with the growth of Twitter, that flow of micro-opinions and feelings has become a torrent. Social media clearly likes to express personal opinion.

Mid way between the pure art of wefeelfine.org, and the visceral grunt of Facebook’s ‘Like’ is a grey area of mostly unquantified social thought. That’s where sentiment analysis (also known as opinion mining) resides. As its tools and techniques become more sophisticated it will reap valuable insights from the cacophony – for brands, governments and researchers to understand the feelings of the masses, and then respond to them – without the need for surveys, polling call centres, or focus groups.

The way it works is via natural language processing which uses algorithms to understand the context within which people’s opinions reside. For an in depth theoretical overview of this area, Bo Pang and Lillian Lee’s book Opinion mining and sentiment analysis has plenty to absorb, but in essence, a sentiment analysis service will rate statements as either positive, negative, or neutral, and add up the results. For example, a YouTube comment such as ‘The Social Network sucks’ is clearly negative, whilst a blog saying, ‘The Social Network is not factual, but does capture the essence of the character’, is either neutral or erring towards the positive, and someone tweeting, ‘OMG u mus c JT in #socialnetwork :-) ’ is positive but needs a lot of syntax interpretation. The most sophisticated forms of sentiment analysis are yet to come, but already the technology exists to rate the strength of feeling and weight key influencers amidst many other factors.

Since context is everything, these algorithms will inevitably have a wide reaching impact upon search engines. According to Google’s Matt Cutts, Google Search is already using Sentiment Analysis for reviews, and they filed for a patent back in 2007. Consider, for example, searching on the phrase, ‘antenna problems with the iPhone 4’. This complex question requires a fair bit of individual research and unpicking from the search results, and while the answer is interesting to a member of the public, it’s vital to the manufacturer. You can be sure Apple was listening closely to the noise on the web before they gave away US$100m worth of free iPhone 4 bumper cases.

Financial markets are also interested in turning the fuzzy into facts with companies such as Thomson Reuters exploring sentiment news in the form of Market Sentiment, but it is in the branding sector that sentiment analysis is seeing the most visible evolution. Over the last ten years the concept of customer engagement has grown due to the fragmentation of market segments and customer loyalty. The rise of social media has opened new ways to review global opinion, with Nielsen Buzzmetrics being one of the first to collate and display the user trends.

The principal is that you type in a brand name or subject and the sentiment analysis service will return a dashboard or chart analysis of the positive, negative or neutral opinions from the social web: Twitter, Facebook, Social Networks, RSS feeds, 100 million blogs.

A lot of big brands are already using these services from the larger players. We see Paypal, Nokia, Skype, Xerox and Ogilvy using Alterian; The Economist using Jodange; AT&T, Barnes & Noble and Playstation are using Lithium; Nokia, Roche and HSBC are with Sysomos; Adobe, National Geographic, 3M and Dell with Radian6 ; Wiley, Vodafone and T-Mobile with Attensity; AOL, Nissan and Marriott with Clarabridge; and The Body Shop are with Brand Watch.

Smaller solutions are also available, such as Chatterscope which allows you to monitor sentiment changes via simple alert messages. And Evri has released their Vibology widget which can be embedded in any web page to show a similar rating meter.

These products are already mature enough to use standardised processes for harvesting, cleaning, processing, and delivering results to sophisticated analytics dashboards. The more developed sentiment analysis companies (above) are correctly perceiving this is vital for Customer Relationship Management, and that they need to provide the correct tools to Marketing Managers who will want to tailor their campaigns based on the results they uncover.

However, it is also an emerging technology, one which requires a lot of artificial intelligence inspired computing to glean relevance – not only from languages other than English, but also from emoticons, acronyms and social media grammar – without which a lot of Twitter would be unreadable. Until these issues are fully resolved, the biggest caveat is therefore on accuracy, and the efficacy of the ratings.

Pull: The power of the semantic web to transform your business

Wednesday, October 6th, 2010

The internet is changing. It’s becoming driven by structured data, and as the databases connect, computers will be able to make rule-based assumptions and take action on our behalf, as individuals, and businesses. This interconnection is often referred to as ‘the semantic web’, and one of the features of it is a seeming ability for the web to use our information and draw in other relevant connections. At Business21C we’re calling this phenomenon The thinking web.

David Siegel’s book Pull: The power of the semantic web to transform your business, offers a perspective on the impact and potential behind this shift. His key message is that the internet has grown up as a push-based system: a ‘search for and get sent’ model in which a person looks online; finds a match; the business checks their stock; calls a supplier; and sends it to the user. This will now become pull-based. Driven by the information we upload, things will come to us automatically. Siegel calls this The Performance Economy – a world of ‘getting what we need when we need it’. As he says, ‘Pull leads to performance. Just as pulling metadata aligns your customer’s data with yours, in the performance economy, your company’s economics are aligned with your customer’s. While the push economy is based on process, the performance economy is based on outcomes.”

In the ‘push’ model a delivery item is ordered, then addressed and sent to a specific location; tax returns are completed and filed. But with ‘pull’, if the shelves are nearing empty the replacement products are automatically ordered; a delivery item is told our identity and it seeks us out through co-operative delivery networks; and our tax returns become live transactional data exchanged with the tax department.

Privacy and security are clearly massive concerns for this vision of the future. But Siegel sees these issues being solved by the creation of personal data lockers. Stored online, Identity 3.0 lockers hold everything there is to know about us and our preferences and possessions. And amidst this ‘personal ontology’ are our privacy settings, which let medical practitioners alone see our health story or the online car market to see our desired new vehicle.

Inevitably Siegel embarks on some futurology to illustrate the potential that he’s explaining. He speculates that we are only one percent along the path to this transition, and that US$1 Trillion of inefficiency each year could be removed from the US economy. And he feels that it paves the way for revolutions in health reform, self-building legal frameworks, Fair Tax, and totally new business practices and customer relationships.

“Pull” (the book) is an informative and highly accessible read for such a complicated set of ideas about our technological future. Siegel is not only passionate and committed to the idea, but even uses the book as a call for like-minded people and investors to help him make it happen.

David Siegel
Pull: The power of the semantic web to transform your business
Hardcover: 288 pages
Publisher: Portfolio Hardcover; 1 edition (December 31, 2009)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1591842778
ISBN-13: 978-1591842774
http://www.amazon.com/Pull-Power-Semantic-Transform-Business/dp/1591842778

Edition 17: Talking sales

Sunday, August 29th, 2010

Business21C Weekly is now available through the iTunes Podcast directory. To subscribe directly via iTunes, go to the Advanced menu in iTunes and select Subscribe to Podcast. Then paste in the following URL: http://www.business21c.com.au/podcasts/feed

Business21C Weekly is broadcast on Sydney’s 2SER 107.3 fm radio station at 9:00 am each Monday morning.

A sales team sits at the pointy end of any business strategy. They bring in the cash that pays the wages, and they’re the connection between you and your customers.

Two sales experts join us in the Business21c Weekly studio to consider how to get the best out of your sales talent: Ciaran McGuigan, Founder of Strike Force Sales and Simon Harrop, Principal Consultant at Straight Ahead Sales. We explore the three p’s of sales: personality, persistence and planning, and the power of a big mortgage as motivator when you’re closing a deal.

In a business environment where we are all sales people at some stage, selling our organisations or ourselves, we look at some basic sales skills. And the cold call: why is it so tough to pick up the phone and pitch to a stranger? Because selling is an emotional roller coaster, and sales staff are people too.

UTSpeaks: Our very survival

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010

On 3rd August, 2010, over three hundred and fifty people packed into the Great Hall at the University of Technology to hear from three of Australia’s leading sustainability thinkers, Professor Dexter Dunphy, Professor Thomas Clarke and Professor Jim Falk. Chaired by Network 10 Environment Reporter, Emily Rice, it was dubbed ‘an opportunity to think about our very survival’.

Emily Rice set the discussions in the context of the lead up to the August Federal Election: ‘The matters up for discussion tonight are complex. Julia Gillard is seeking consensus on climate change, but Tony Abbott thinks climate change is crap. The youth of today don’t view saving the environment as debatable. For them, it is non-negotiable.’

Emeritus Professor Dexter Dunphy of UTS Business painted a perspective  of the sustainability and economic challenges he believes the world faces. It was a call to arms for the audience to stop relying on someone else to come up with the solution to the planet’s woes.

‘You don’t grow potatoes by talking about them. We’ve done a lot of talking, but it’s time to actually do something about this planet and for society.’

In Dunphy’s view the global financial crisis and the trend towards business as usual are the two biggest threats facing the survival of the planet.

He outlined how climate change, peak oil and population growth are converging to cause dramatic changes in life as we know it and predicted that 2030 will be the tipping point in deciding the planet’s future.

‘If we don’t take dramatic measures between now and then, we will lose our ability to control climate change.’

The main things he said are vital included moving to zero net CO2 emissions, moving to a zero waste world and reducing demand for material resources.

He said the shift will need be similar to mobilising for war and will require social change. ‘Less stuff, more services with a focus on quality of life.’

Professor Thomas Clarke, Professor of Management and Director of the UTS Centre for Corporate Governance, spoke about ‘the impending inevitable integration of corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and sustainability’ for the business sector.

‘Today companies have to respect the imperative of being socially responsible and sustainable environmentally, in order to receive a license to operate.’

According to Clarke, Australia has the highest rate of greenhouse gas emissions in the world but our political leaders have not ‘grasped the scale of what is needed to prevent a climate increase to 2 degrees celsius.’

Commenting on the political fate of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme and an Emissions Trading Scheme for Australia, he said:

‘It’s an appalling situation in Australia and the fact that we’ve lost two political leaders quite recently, who were casualties of this process, is part of the tragedy.’

Clarke said leadership and action on climate change needs to come from the business community and consumers.

Professor Jim Falk, Director of the Australian Centre for Science, Innovation and Society at the University of Melbourne and author of the recently published, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet shared his views on his theory of reflexive capacity for adaptive transition. His theory relies on people choosing to change their impacts on the planet and working together.

It is Falk’s belief that our lifetimes are incredibly significant.

He explained what a short time humans have lived on earth, in relation to its age and said technological innovation is less challenging than the social innovation needed to change the way we live.