Posts Tagged ‘Design thinking’

Edition 6: Gehry is go!

Friday, June 18th, 2010

Business21C Weekly is now available through the iTunes Podcast directory
Alternatively, to subscribe directly via iTunes on your computer, go to the Advanced menu in iTunes and select Subscribe to Podcast. Then paste the following URL: http://www.business21c.com.au/podcasts/feed

And it is confirmed: Frank Gehry will build the new UTS Business School building, funded by Australia’s most generous act of educational philanthropy, a $25 million gift from Chinese business leader, Dr Chau Chak Wing. A special edition of the Business21C Weekly celebrates this milestone, featuring perspectives from Frank himself, UTS Vice-Chancellor Ross Milbourne, Dean of UTS Business, Roy Green, and Dean of UTS Design, Architecture and Building, Desley Luscombe.

How did it happen? How did UTS attract the attention of the world’s greatest living architect? Why is Frank Gehry the right architect to build a new kind of business school? What will the building mean for UTS, for Sydney, and for the shape of business education?

Interpreting design thinking

Friday, June 4th, 2010

Design thinking offers real and really great value for organisations. But the idea is threatened by its own success, suggests Professor Kees Dorst.

http://www.vimeo.com/12256495

I am deeply concerned with the current trend of combining disparate, vaguely creative activities under the label of ‘design thinking’, and presenting these as a panacea for all business innovation woes.

In order to get beyond the hype, it is important that we articulate the different kinds of design thinking that exist, and outline the different ways they can be applied in the context of innovation and organisational change. I offer for discussion here a framework for positioning design thinking. The model uses a basis of formal logic combined with common notions from design research to clarify the nature of design reasoning and distinguish between different kinds and levels of design thinking.

A view from logic: kinds of reasoning

To initially position design thinking we build on the way fundamentally different kinds of reasoning are described in formal logic. The simplest way to describe the reasoning patterns is through comparing different settings of the knowns and unknowns in the equation:

In deduction, we know the ‘what’, the ‘players’ in a situation we need to attend to, and we know ‘how’ they will operate together. This allows us to safely predict results. For instance, if we know that there are stars in the sky, and we are aware of the laws of gravity that govern their movements, we can predict where a star will be at a certain point in time.

Alternatively, in induction, we know the ‘what’ in the situation (stars), and we can observe results (position changes across the sky). But we do not know the ‘how’, the laws that govern these movements. The proposing of ‘working principles’ that could explain the observed behaviour (aka hypotheses) is a creative act.

These two forms of analytical reasoning help predict and explain phenomena that are already in the world. What if we want to create valuable new things for others? The basic reasoning pattern then is abduction:



Abduction comes in two forms, and what they have in common is that we actually know the value we want to achieve.

In the first form of abduction (which is often associated with ‘problem solving’) we also know the ‘how’ (the ‘working principle’ that will help achieve the value). The only thing missing is a ‘what’ (an object, a service, a system), so we set out to create it. This is often what designers and engineers do – create an object that works within a known working principle, and within a set scenario of value creation. This scenario for value creation, the implication that by applying a certain working principle we will create a specific value, is called a ‘frame’ within design literature.


In the second form of abduction, we only know the end value we want to achieve. So we have to figure out ‘what’ to create, while there is no known or chosen ‘working principle’ that we can trust to lead to the aspired value. That means we will most likely have to develop a new frame that helps us to create a ‘working principle’ and a ‘thing’ (object, service, system). Performing this complex creative feat is often seen as the core of design thinking.

A view from practice: applying design thinking

In the real world, problematic situations arise when the equation (what’ plus ‘how’ leads to ‘value’) that an organisation has been operating under somehow doesn’t work anymore. It can be very hard to fathom what’s wrong: should the ‘what’ be changed? The ‘how’? Perhaps the ‘frame’ is faulty, or maybe we are misreading the values in the world? There are different ways of dealing with this problematic situation.

Initially, organisations often react in a way that requires the least effort and resources: they set out to create a new ‘something’ that will save the day while keeping the ‘how’ and ‘frame’ constant. Alternatively (if this really doesn’t work) the organization could be going to the second abduction mode and also create a new ‘how’. The organisation might do this by just applying one of the other frames that it has in its repertoire. The collection of frames that an organization has at its disposal defines its total practice.

Alternatively the organisation might hire a consultant or designer that uses her experience to bring a new frame to the problematic situation. That frame could be added on to the practice of the organisation for this particular project, quite superficially.

If a new frame is adopted into the practice of the organisation itself, extending that practice, we talk about true innovation. Radical innovations can happen when an organisation goes beyond just adopting frames, breaks away from its current ways of working and world view, and sets out to create a completely new frame. This final case is the where the processes of design thinking and business innovation are most intimately linked.

To conclude

We have seen that design thinking can take many forms and impact an organisation in many different ways – ranging from problem solving within an existing frame, to in-depth innovation that changes the practice of an organisation. The basis of design thinking is more or less the same in all cases, but design research has shown that there are great differences in the kinds of design reasoning, the nature of the design activities (formulating, representing, moving, evaluating, managing), design processes and design skills needed on these different levels. It would be unwise to gloss over these differences. The framework presented above could be the backbone of a new, much more detailed articulation of design thinking for business innovation.

Ideas are the currency at the Australian Innovation Festival

Monday, May 10th, 2010

In today’s world of breakneck change, companies need ways to develop ideas into strategies, strategies into prototypes, and prototypes into the next big thing. Quickly.

One way to do this is to combine two of the most powerful forces known to business: the market, and the crowd.

In the marketplace for ideas, those ideas that attract the most love and attention will be the ones that win out. They’ll get funding and intellectual energy that others don’t – no matter how much senior management pushes them.

The question is, how can organisations attract ideas, and then leverage the knowledge and understanding of its people to help the most viable ones become reality. What’s needed is a transparent internal market for ideas that allows everybody to see the ideas on offer, and gives everyone a stake in the process.

The answer? Social media. The way that social media sites operate is perfectly adapted to the generation, feedback and refinement of ideas into reality. Individuals can provide their ideas, feedback and participate in the refinement process, without leadership or facilitation – it happens as a result of the power of the swarm.

Software provider Spigit has developed a social media platform for doing just this. Customers such as Cisco, Pfizer, and Southwest Airlines use Spigit’s innovation management software for corralling the to-and-fro of collaboration across the enterprise, in a transparent process that encourages cross-fertilising of ideas through the organisation.

The software has been customised for the Australian Innovation Festival. The Australian Innovation Festival Ideas site invites all comers to provide ideas, to give their feedback on other participants ideas, and to invest their spigits (a fantasy currency created for the comptition) in those ideas they think are most promising.

Once the Australian Innovation Festival concludes, ideas in each category with the most investment dollars from registrants are awarded access to advisors and investors to continue to develop the idea for possible funding and real world implementation.

Business21C will support those ideas that successfully emerge from the process by providing expert business insight and academic analysis through UTS Business. They will also be supported by other partners including Patent Attorneys Griffith Hack; Innovation think tank the Hargraves Institute.

Ideas can be submitted against four themes: A Better Future for our Children (ideas to help future generations); Sustainable Environments (climate control, green technology etc.); The Connected World (making use of the national broadband network); and The Recovering Economy (making Australia a more robust economy).

Register your idea here now.

Thinque tank with Anders Sorman-Nilsson and Nils Vesk

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

Change doesn’t care if you like it or not. It happens without your permission. How do organisations and people stay ahead of the curve in a world where the fastest growing economy is a communist one, rugby league players are metrosexuals who moisturise, and Susan Boyle took less than 48 hours to reach more people than radio did in the first 38 years of its evolution?

Professional agitators Anders Sorman-Nilsson and Nils Vesk challenged a roomful of Sydney’s best and brightest brains to upgrade their thinking. Sparks flew.

http://www.vimeo.com/11096587

‘Have you ever stopped to think, and forgotten to start again?’  – Winnie the Pooh.

That was not the problem for the audience at the Sydney Opera House on April 15.

According to Sorman-Nilsson, the world has changed, and it’s a little out of whack. Things ain’t the way they used to be and that is exactly how they ought to be. Kids are excelling in second life, but flunking in first life; Maslow’s hierarchy of needs has been flipped on its head. It used to be that we had to learn one new skill every year, then every month, then every week. How long before things will be changing for each and every one of us hourly?

The world has just been through the worst recession we never had, and things are accelerating post-downturn faster than ever before. Companies are struggling just to keep up. It is up to the leaders of business to ensure that they don’t waste a good crisis.

Over first fifteen minutes of the event, Anders and Nils ran through a series of significant trends, observations and external scans that indicate how quickly and unpredictably the world of business is changing in the twenty-first century. Anders flew through his mind-bending presentation assisted by mindmapping software prezi. Take a look here:

Sydney Opera House Thinque Tank on Prezi

View Prezi - large file - please be patient: its worth it!

‘A mind once stretched by a new idea never returns to its original dimensions.’ So said Oliver Wendell Holmes, US author and physician.

Meanwhile, Nils Vesk asked the audience what was on their minds. The topics for discussion emerged:

  • How to get new ideas to business leaders
  • Risk and risk management
  • How to cope with change
  • Are we happier?
  • How can we control greed? And,
  • What is design thinking?

Through the course of the next 90 minutes, the conversation wended its way through these subjects, assisted on its way by passionate interjections from attendees including CEOs, chief creative officers, writers, managers, designers, academics and thinkers of all stripes.

Nils tracked the course of the conversation by drawing and recording the proceedings. His pictures are here:

Visual thinking

See Nils' drawings

Much of the conversation centred around the age old conundrum of stimulating short term innovation while balancing long term profitability. Craig Davis, chief creative officer of Publicis Mojo went further, saying innovation can no longer be solely about the bottom line, it must be directed towards solving the major problems facing the world. The measurability of innovation is a perennial issue for business leaders.

How to effectively engage with customers and the use of social media was a significant focal point, as were ideas for empowering staff to experiment, take risk, and fail.

Thanks again for the invitation to the B21C event last Thursday night at the Opera House. It was a fantastic event! I really came away with lots of new ideas that I picked up from both Anders + Nils, as well as the other business leaders that were in the audience. The conversations were very thought provoking and I am really looking forward to reading the book we all received. Ive been to quite a few business discussions that have been hosted by a range of companies over the last 12 months and this one was by far the most interesting. Well done !

Killer event last night. I’m churning through the book….Thank you for what was another fascinating evening.

Thanks for a fabulous event – extremely stimulating discussion amongst a great crowd of people. Sydney doesn’t have nearly enough of this kind of thing.

I really enjoyed last night. Its been a long time since I felt so excited at a business event. I’m really looking forward to the next Business21C shindig – what will you come up with next?

Thinque tank photos

See photos from the evening

The design of business

Monday, March 29th, 2010

Roger Martin, Dean of the Rotman Business School at the University of Toronto, addressed an audience of business leaders at the Sydney Opera House on 18 March 2010. His talk, on the subject of his latest book The Design of Business, provided the backdrop for the launch of Business21C magazine.

http://www.vimeo.com/10452842 http://www.vimeo.com/10452582

McDonald’s, IBM, Procter & Gamble, and even Apple without Steve Jobs. Each of these companies famously suffered from innovation fatigue. Having been hugely successful at producing a particular kind of product or service exceedingly efficiently, they couldn’t shift out of doing things their way, even when the world changed around them. They were left producing stuff consumers didn’t want.

According to Roger Martin, these companies had been too focused on the algorithms that had brought them so much success in the first place. In this model, companies look at a certain mystery and try to solve it – in the case of McDonald’s, for instance, how to serve good quality, consistent food quickly given a limited menu. Over the first few years, the McDonald brothers took this mystery and honed it to a heuristic – a rule of thumb – that worked well across a few restaurants. When Ray Croc took over, he further refined the heuristic to algorithm – a form of code similar to a computer program – taking the production of a hamburger into the realms of operation science.

With this algorithm in hand, McDonald’s restaurants spread across the globe, and the company became hugely profitable. But when the world changed, and consumers began to demand healthier, more flexible options, McDonald’s was left with their old algorithm producing inappropriate product.

This happens time and again, says Martin, because once an organisation has an efficient and effective algorithm working well, and is raking it in as a result, managers and others in the organisation have a vested interest in protecting the existing algorithm. In Martin’s terminology, thinking within the company becomes reliability oriented – everything needs to be analysed and proved before becoming adopted, because the emphasis is on reliability rather than validity. Reliable solutions provide the same result every time. In contrast, valid results provide the right solution.

The problem within the existing business culture, says Martin, is that validity cannot be proven with existing knowledge. You cannot come to a valid conclusion through deductive or inductive reasoning. Instead you have to use abductive thought, which jumps to conclusions given a certain understanding of the world, intuition, and insight into how the world might be at some point in the future. This kind of thing is difficult to prove, and is anathema to most business conversations. Yet it lies at the heart of true innovation, driving the journey through the knowledge tunnel from mystery to heuristic to algorithm – the source of profitability.

Instead of becoming fixated on reliability, companies need to develop a way to balance reliability and validity, to accept abductive reasoning and take leaps of faith. One way to do this is through the adoption of design thinking as a business methodology.

In his book The Design of Business, Martin provides the example of Procter & Gamble, a company that had suffered from the classic analysis paralysis, a focus on reliability rather than validity. Through a CEO sponsored design-thinking initiative, the company managed to turn its innovative capabilities around, and return to its place as a world leading packaged goods company.

BUSINESS21C & AFR BOSS PRESENT ROGER MARTIN

View Flickr Slideshow

At breakfast at the Sydney Opera House on 18 March 2010, Martin presented his ideas to an audience that enthusiastically joined the conversation, asking questions about everything from the global financial crisis through to corporate evolution. Download the slides from the presentation.

The integrative, collaborative future of business education

Monday, November 30th, 2009

“If the twentieth century gave rise to knowledge workers with deep expertise, the twenty-first century will require leaders who can foster integrative thinking and collaboration across fields and specialties. Collaboration, not coordination will be the task of management.”
Rosabeth Moss Kanter, on Drucker, Harvard Business Review, November 2009

The last twelve months have been tumultuous. The global financial crisis has cascaded through the business world, and taken us in business education with it. Schools across the globe are reexamining their foundations, from the subjects they are teaching and the way that they teach them, to the very philosophical underpinnings of their view of the world. The same is true at UTS Business, says Dean Roy Green.

http://www.vimeo.com/6290946

The crisis here is not acute: we are doing well by all measurable indicators. We have strong and growing numbers of applications; our students are graduating to good jobs in a broad variety of industries; our faculty is collecting awards for world leading research across the globe; our research and rankings scores are building solidly and steadily. But we cannot afford complacency for a number of reasons. Firstly, change in any case tends to force itself upon those who do not embrace it themselves.

In addition, UTS Business has been offered a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a new, iconic, purpose-built teaching, research and learning facility in a central location as part of the ambitious UTS Campus Development Masterplan. A new space will force change of its own. More importantly, it provides us with a stimulus to refine the way we work, to enable our evolution to a world-leading centre of business thought.

There is no reason why UTS Business cannot rank amongst the best business schools in the world. This is an opportunity to reshape our school into a unique institution that truly builds on our strengths, and indeed on other centres of excellence at UTS, in design, engineering, science, law and the humanities.

The following is a presentation given by Professor Roy Green to a UTS Business Alumni party held on November 16, 2009.

The need to change

http://www.vimeo.com/7845604

At the beginning of the year, I attended the AACSB (The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business) conference in Orlando, Florida. It felt like a group therapy as the deans of 500 business schools considered their role in and response to the ongoing global financial crisis. They didn’t come up with very much.

The Economist took a similar view recently. In its 24 September issue it reported: ‘This has been a year of sackcloth and ashes for the world’s business schools. Critics have accused them of churning out jargon-spewing economic vandals. Many professors have accepted at least some of the blame for the global catastrophy. Deans have drawn up blueprints for reform. The result? Precious little.’

But it is not just the global financial crisis that is driving the change process at UTS Business. We operate in a globalised economy, but as business schools we have not been as globalised as the companies whose leaders we teach. Technology is changing around us. Within our classrooms and the way we do business education, we need to keep up with the potentials offered by emerging technologies.

Organisations are also changing. An emphasis on flat structures, teamwork, agility, innovation and rapid response to market is shaping organisations. Business schools must respond, adapt to and shape these changes. Organisations are increasingly participating in distributed networks of innovation, and making the most of opportunities locally and globally. The workforce is also changing. Students are becoming more demanding. They arrive at business schools understanding their ambition and looking for something that will meet that ambition.

Finally we are operating increasingly in a knowledge society, where competitive advantage will be driven by knowledge and ingenuity.

Average is not good enough

http://www.vimeo.com/7845833

The need to change was recognised in a report commissioned by the government in 2008, the Terry Cutler Review of Australia’s national innovation system, Venturous Australia. In it, the review team argues that ‘deans of business schools could consider leading a discussion on management education and its role more broadly in education, training and innovation.’ This is a significant task for Australia’s business schools to grapple with.

The message that knowledge is driven by the innovative capabilities of our organisations is clearly getting through. Business leaders must be equipped to manage innovative and creative teams, in an environment that nurtures thinking that goes beyond a textbook perspective and embraces an understanding of business solutions.

Kim Carr, Minister of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research commissioned a study of management, lead by UTS, as part of a global survey of management by the London School of Economics and McKinsey. This study was launched in November. Its findings demonstrate that while Australian managers are not among the worst managers in the world, they are not among the best. We are average. But why be satisfied with average? Average will never catch up with the global best.

We are average, in particular, at people management. In fact, Australia lags behind the world in our ability to manage talent and to get the best out of the people in our organisations. And as the report demonstrates, there is a relationship between good management and productivity all over the world. Addressing this must be a priority for Australian business schools.

The ‘so what’ for UTS Business

Where does UTS Business fit into all of this?

http://www.vimeo.com/7845952

We are one of the largest business schools in Australia with 5000 undergraduates, 2500 postgraduates and 250 full time faculty and staff. It’s a substantial operation. It generates revenue and ticks over. It is well-rated by the government in its learning and teaching performance fund. However we should not be satisfied with that. As I mentioned, the world is moving on, and only business schools that understand and respond to change will remain relevant.

As a result, and in conjunction with a company called Second Road, we have been holding what we are calling ‘a strategic conversation’ within the faculty over the last few months. We are asking ourselves where we want to be as a business school in two, five, ten years’ time. And how do we get there? The faculty itself is driving this process, asking a lot of questions like ‘where do I want to be?’, ‘what kind of business school do I want to work in?’ and ‘how do I engage with my students, stakeholders, business, the community?’

We are hoping this process will reach fruition over the coming few months. The thinking behind it is based on the idea of integrated thinking, or design thinking: being able to visualise solutions across boundaries. Because this is where innovation occurs, at the interface between disciplines. Integrated thinking underlies our reviews of undergraduate and postgraduate courses, as we look at how we develop our programs in a global context.

  • EMBA: We are shaping a global EMBA, to expand it in association with international business schools, to create global citizens who can work across borders and across cultures, with exposure to top-tier global business faculty.
  • Executive education: We need to think about what companies want from business schools. Is there a role for short courses directly linked to the needs of companies? How do we fit into this context?
  • Research: UTS is increasingly known for the quality of its research, and the emphasis of research linked to practice, partly as a result of a number of high calibre faculty appointments.
  • External engagement: Our reputation surveys tell us that UTS is the place that business likes to do business with and we want to give substance to that rhetoric, by strengthening our engagement with alumni, stakeholders and friends in business and in the broader community.

The broad UTS vision

http://www.vimeo.com/7885185

This review is happening within the context of a broader vision of the university which is emerging around the themes of creative, technology and innovation in our Design faculty, our IT faculty, in Arts and Social Sciences.

It is that vision which has attracted $17 milllion of government money for a Creative Industries Innovation Centre. We are situated in Pyrmont, in Ultimo and in Haymarket, at the centre of the most concentrated creative precinct in Australia. We have developed a relationships with a number of corporate partners – Ernst & Young, Animal Logic, Macquarie Bank, the Powerhouse Museum and the ABC – to pitch for this centre as part of the government’s Enterprise Connect program, providing services to businesses in the creative industries space, an important growth area for the Australian economy as well as contributing culturally.

At the business school we see ourselves as moving in the same direction to broaden people’s perception of business education and how that relates to the organisations for which they work.

Our new building

http://www.vimeo.com/7846175

Finally, we have approval for a new building on the old Dairy Farmers Warehouse site opposite the ABC. We have engaged an iconic architect whose name we cannot yet reveal, but who I am confident will create a building not just for UTS, not just for Sydney, but for the world. It give us an opportunity to translate the vision we have around education into the physical space, where academics will be working, where students will be learning, as part of that creativity, technology, innovation approach.

As Peter Drucker, the legendary management theorist said: The best way to predict the future is to create it. We believe that we will indeed be leading the world in business education in the twenty first century, and I invite you to join us on this journey.