Posts Tagged ‘Social media’

Edition 48 – The ‘Like’ economy

Sunday, April 3rd, 2011

Business21C Weekly is available through the iTunes Podcast directory. To subscribe directly via iTunes, go to the Advanced menu in iTunes and select Subscribe to Podcast. Then paste in the following URL: http://www.business21c.com.au/podcasts/feed

Business21C Weekly is broadcast on Sydney’s 2SER 107.3 fm radio station at 9:00 am each Monday morning.

As Facebook, Twitter and YouTube become increasingly ubiquitous in all facets of our personal and professional lives, there is little doubt that social media is changing the pace of business. This week, Business21C weekly examines the ‘Like’ economy.

With 140 million messages of 140 characters or less travelling through cyberspace everyday via Twitter, how do businesses incorporate social media in their marketing mix, and how are consumers responding? From spawning revolutions to giving customer feedback, social media have made their mark, and won’t be going anywhere. For business, this has meant creating SM strategy objectives and responding to, and being ready for, a changing future.

We talk to Rod McGuinness, social media producer at ABC Radio, Gay Flashman, director at digtital communications firm Formative, and Sandra de Castron from NAB about the ramifications of social media on business.

Edition 35: Best of 2010 – The business of news

Monday, January 3rd, 2011

Business21C Weekly is now available through the iTunes Podcast directory. To subscribe directly via iTunes, go to the Advanced menu in iTunes and select Subscribe to Podcast. Then paste in the following URL: http://www.business21c.com.au/podcasts/feed

Business21C Weekly is broadcast on Sydney’s 2SER 107.3 fm radio station at 9:00 am each Monday morning.

For this summer edition we are going to play a best of 2010 for Business21C Weekly. Today is the second and last “best of 2010″ with a repeat of  ’The business of news’:

This edition of Business21c Weekly looks at the business of news, as bloggers-in-pyjamas take on the might of the global media empires, as News Limited launches its paywall experiment at the Sunday Times, as iPad sales top two million worldwide, and its first look-alike challenger the iped is released in China – identical but at a fifth of the cost.

The news media landscape is a laboratory of experiments. The question isn’t simply who is making the news, but who is making money from news, and how? And how do we know whom we can trust?

Our guest is career journalist Tony Maniaty, veteran international reporter of conflict and crisis from East Timor to Lithuania. Tony is a Senior Lecturer in International Journalism at UTS and member of the advisory board of the Australian Centre for Independent Journalism.

Is it a David and Goliath contest? Or is there truly room for all, gatekeepers and gatecrashers, to meet our ever-expanding, but ever more fragmented demand for news, information and entertainment?

The social life of peasants

Tuesday, September 14th, 2010

China’s itinerant population of 200 million is considered three-low: low education, low income, low consumption power. But its cultural and connectivity needs are significant, as is the industry catering to it, writes Professor Wanning Sun.

There is a nation 10 times the size of Australia migrating ceaselessly across China, seeking work that is deemed too dirty, dangerous or difficult for ordinary urban dwellers. Around 200 million people have left their rural homes and now travel across the country in search of subsistence labouring jobs. They have become essential to the functioning of China’s economy and society, yet they are the most marginalised social group in the country in terms of their economic status, political voice and cultural presence.

The Australian Research Council has funded a project examining the cultural lives of this population. Its objective is to understand the cultural needs and associated social-media consumption of these migrant workers. What radio and television programs do they consume? Do they have mobile phones and how do they use them? What do they do online? Do they use online social networking, and how?

A recent field trip to China took in construction and factory sites in Beijing and more rural areas around Dongguan and Shenzhen in the Pearl River Delta region and Suzhou in the Yangzi River Delta. With the assistance of a couple of non-government organisations, I was able to spend time in workers’ dormitories to examine migrants’ media-consumption habits. This trip was part of one of a number of biannual field trips in an ongoing longitudinal research project that will continue over a number of years.

The trip revealed some interesting sociological phenomena, even around simple demographics of migrant worker groups. For instance, construction workers tend to be men across a wide range of age groups, while factory workers tend to be younger – say, 18 to 25 years of age – and of both genders. Typically, factory workers are more urbane in outlook, dressing like other urban-dwellers outside of work hours, while construction workers tend to have closer links to the land, going home to farm for a fortnight during the harvest and labelling themselves ‘peasant workers’. In contrast, factory workers have little experience of rural life or farming, and this I believe adds to their anguish and sense of isolation, which have been the subject of a great deal of media attention lately.

Mobile media of migrants

Few migrant workers have computers but the vast majority have mobile phones. One type of phone, dubbed the ‘Smartphone’, looks like a regular mobile phone but has limited coverage and is just for local use. It costs next to nothing and migrant workers have taken it up enthusiastically. Telecommunications companies see it as a way to capture the lower end of the market.

Another example is the ‘Bandit Phone’ or ‘Shanzhaiji’. It looks just like an iPhone and has as many functions but is available at a fraction of the price. It is produced by the migrant workers themselves and is intended mainly for their use. The Shanzhaiji is unreliable, but it does resemble the real iPhone and is linked to the socioeconomic status of this group of people.

When the third-generation (3G) mobile-phone network was launched in China last year, a vast range of compatible products was marketed towards upwardly mobile, professional, technologically connected people with high consumption power. But the largest social group to subscribe to the 3G network was migrant workers, because their need for storage capacity is surprisingly substantial. These workers are absolutely mobile and typically, they have no other devices on which to store data: 3G technology enables them to store photos, download music, videos and novels, and engage in a host of activities that would have been unavailable to them previously.

The most popular social-media tool used by China’s migrant population is Tencent QQ, China’s largest free instant-messaging service. At any one time, there are more than 80 million users chatting on QQ. With a monthly mobile subscription of five yuan (A$0.85), it is distinctly working class: white-collar professionals tend to stick to MSN.

The workers are most likely to use QQ when they want to meet new friends or catch up with people they’ve met since leaving home. If they want to contact their parents, they’ll usually use their mobile phones. Typically, these workers value the connections they’ve made since leaving home. There is a collective identity: we’re all on the road; we’re all new to the city, which is hostile to us; we don’t really belong here but somehow we’re together.

Because few of these workers own computers or laptops, connectivity for this population comes through internet cafes. More men than women go to the cafes. What they actually do there is also gendered. Most people play computer games. Occasionally, they play solo online with people they don’t know but most huddle around a computer with a couple of friends. A few women watch films or television dramas. But almost everyone also has QQ open on the screen so they can see whenever a new message comes through or somebody is passing through. They might see that a friend is also online and send a message to tell the friend what they’re doing before going back to the computer game.

Surprisingly, jobs are not found on the internet, they are found either through word of mouth or the Government Labour and Human Resources Agency.

From a business perspective, these 200 million people are viewed as ‘producers of value’ – workers who exist for their labour – rather than ‘consumers of value’. They are considered to be a ‘three-low’ community: low education, low income and low consumption power. But as this project has revealed, a number of technological and business innovations have emerged recently that cater for the cultural and communication needs of this vast, but poor population.

This article is an edited version of an interview with Business21C Deputy Editor Kirsten Lees. Professor Sun’s research will eventually be published as a monograph, a series of journal articles, and a number of media interviews and articles.

The thinking web

Tuesday, September 14th, 2010

From tweeting dairy cows to RFID tags on white goods, our increasing capacity to transfer smart data makes for less wastage, faster service and better business. Mike Hanley and Scott David report.

‘More copious soon the teat-pressed torrents flow.’ So said Charge Cindy, a cow from Buttermine Farms, Ontario, while giving 20.2-kilograms of milk on June 4 at 5.25am. If Virgil’s Georgics III seems extraordinarily eloquent for a cow, add to that the fact that she didn’t just say it: she tweeted it over the internet.

Charge Cindy was wired to the web by a team at the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, which is communicating the movements – the meals, milk yields, hatches, matches and dispatches – of 12 favourite cows on Buttermine. Each has a radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag embedded in it, and the farm is equipped with sensors able to read them. As the cows move around the farm, their actions are translated into predefined tweets, generating a stream of data. What’s more, this data is collected by systems that are able to interpret them and translate the knowledge into actions.

So if Charge Cindy approaches the electronic milking shed tweeting: ‘Come on robot, let me in!’ before she’s ready to be milked, the shed doors don’t open and she’ll tweet: ‘Tried to get into the pen. No such luck.’ Buttermine knows whether its cows are being milked, or are feeding or grazing. More than that, it gets a sense of how its cows are feeling. What could you do if you knew where all your suppliers (or customers) were right now and how they were feeling?

Welcome to the future of the internet: the thinking web.

Mobile sensors, screen-based devices and objects will communicate via the common platform of the web, exchanging smart data through business processes. There are key technological ideas here that you will be hearing much more about over the next decade as the thinking web evolves the semantic web, the internet of things, open data, linked data, the real-time web and augmented reality, among many others.

The internet of things

The thinking web

Click to enlarge

Buttermine’s cows are the advance guard in the emergence of one part of the future of the internet, or ‘the thinking web’: the internet of things. This is what you get when you connect and track real-world objects through time and space – cows, juice cartons, mobile phones, cars, whatever, wherever, whenever.

The implications for business are mind-blowing. Walmart has been pushing its suppliers to chip all their products at the pallet level since 2004. In that year, Erwin De Spiegeleire, chief operating officer of EAN International (now known as GS1), which is responsible for the world’s bar codes, calculated that Walmart’s savings could be $8.35 billion annually, with $6.7 billion alone saved in reduced manual-scanning costs. That is small bikkies compared to what improved data analysis and interconnectedness of systems will mean in years to come.

Procter & Gamble thinks it will increase sales by $1.2 billion a year through RFID technology by reducing the incidences of out-of-stock items in stores. Retailer Marks & Spencer has been using item-level RFID tags for more than three years and reports that it now takes a mere five seconds to receive data from 50 containers, an 85 percent reduction in the time it takes to scan bar codes.

The information nervous system

Companies have been busy building information-technology nervous systems for three decades. Until now, enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems have been exceedingly good at managing things that stand still, such as plant and equipment. When you connect these systems to the internet and via the internet to other systems, you have a whole new beast. Just-in-time inventory management becomes possible not just at factory level but at shelf level, too.

What IBM calls ‘A Smarter Planet’ is part of this emergent trend. IBM sees its own sensors, RFID tags and cloud services for real-time supply-chain tracking as a major business opportunity – and they’re selling it vocally to give the idea traction in the marketplace. Sensors are being deployed on highways and supermarket shelves, and in poultry products, art galleries and white goods.

As the unit cost of volume-purchased RFID tags has plummeted from US$1.30 in 2001 to between seven and 15 cents today, it becomes more viable to put them into everyday objects.

Flowing from this are the opportunities to interconnect those systems and make sense of the information they share. The insider intelligence that can be gained as a consequence of all that information is a bottomless goldmine for companies such as IBM, which calls it business analytics and optimisation.

So what needs to be in place to make sense of all the information that’s coming in from these instruments and systems? And how can it be turned into real-time business operations?

A semantic solution

The main way to achieve this is to add layers of meaning to the raw data being collected by this unprecedented proliferation of chips, mobile devices and sensors. It is one thing to collect data about where your cows are and the last time they got milked; it’s quite another thing to know what this means in terms of tomorrow’s milk volume and the number of trucks that will be needed to carry it.

The layer of meaning that is placed upon a set of data is known as its semantics. This layer is essential for interoperability between the business systems of one organisation and another. This is a part of what Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web, dubbed ‘the semantic web’. And it underlies his latest quest in that direction: the Linked Open Data Movement, which encourages companies, governments and individuals to put their semantically structured data online to see how its astonishing potential will get unleashed.

Way back in 1999, Berners-Lee said:  ‘I have a dream for the web [in which computers] become capable of analysing all the data on the web – the content, links, and transactions between people and computers. A ‘Semantic Web’, which should make this possible, has yet to emerge, but when it does, the day-to-day mechanisms of trade, bureaucracy and our daily lives will be handled by machines talking to machines. The ‘intelligent agents’ people have touted for ages will finally materialise.’

Indeed, they are. Take, for instance, your local shopping centre. Data shows that there is always a surge in custom at 1pm on a Saturday, when school sport finishes, except when there has been more than 200 millimetres of rain in the past week, because that is when sport is cancelled. So what happens when you connect the inventory system of the food court’s restaurants to data from the meteorology office? Food wastage plummets because the restaurateurs can predict levels of demand much more accurately.

It does not take much imagination to see the immense possibilities here, and the ways in which our business and personal lives could change as a consequence. These solutions already exist. It’s just a matter of distributing this sensor-monitored ‘thinking web’ more widely into the present.

Are we ready?

Tuesday, September 14th, 2010

The world is changing, but so what? Is Australian business poised to take advantage of the wave of opportunity, or is it frozen like a possum in the lights of an oncoming truck? Futurist Glenys McLaughlin spells out the challenges. Kirsten Lees puts them to business.

Scientists sequenced HIV in 15 years, and SARS in 15 days. It took 70 years for the telephone to get the number of users the internet attracted in 15. iPhone sales hit one billion in nine months. Every form of communication technology is doubling in bandwidth and performance every 12 months, and costs are plummeting.

It’s not just tools and technology that are changing. Behaviour across every facet of life is being transformed. Where we go for fun, friendship, advice and education, how we do business and where we take our custom are undergoing radical shifts. One in six higher-education students is enrolled online. Fifteen percent of Australians who formed serious relationships in 2009 met on the web. Online product reviews are the most trusted source of advice before buying, after family and friends. We are spending more time on the internet than in front of the television. All of this was inconceivable even three years ago.

What does it mean for business? Not those looking at the big picture, but the people who sit at the coal face (solar array?), making the decisions that will determine the health of their organisations tomorrow, decisions that may shape the future for all of us. Well, we asked them.

Ken Kanofski, Chief Executive Officer, WSN Environmental Services

‘In our industry, people consider what has been happening over the past decade as significant and exciting change. I don’t think we have. We are still a labour intensive, old technology industry. There will be incredible change to the processing of waste, as recycling becomes more sophisticated. We are becoming less a waste management and more a materials management industry. Technology will drive this change.

We are users of technology, not developers. Our biggest challenge is to decide which technologies to adopt and when to make the leap. There are risks in moving too early, or too late.

There remains enormous scope to create renewable energy from waste. This will be the significant area of emerging technologies for us. We already create 40 megawatts a year capturing gas from landfill and processing. But this scratches the surface of what is possible.

Our biggest human capital issue is the shift associated with a crossover from a logistics and transport business, to a technologically sophisticated workplace. We need to manage and motivate a workforce that straddles the two. It’s is easy for a tribal culture to emerge and we must meld together a workforce with very different skills and characteristics.

Our customer relationships are evolving as more and more of our business-to-business customers look to us for a sophisticated and tailored approach to waste and recycling. It is an exciting field with dramatic results. The nature of the issues are complex. For now social media is not part of our marketing armoury.’

Tony Sutton, National Head of Retail, Myers

‘The retail environment is always evolving and it is important that we are not only up with the latest trends but using them to our advantage. Myer has a presence on Facebook, MySpace and Twitter to communicate quickly and directly to customers. We use SMS alerts and email to ensure that customers are to date with what’s available and we will continue to build on this, learn and evolve. Our website is always expanding allowing customers to purchase products, read catalogues and view live fashion launches.

We have created an iPhone app enabling our customers to view promotions, obtain store information including location and have access to exclusive offers.

That said, we have a very large volume of highly valued MyerOne members who we are able to directly learn from and communicate to. Through detailed analysis of their behaviours we learn more about their shopping habits: patterns, frequency, preferred merchandise categories, and the like. For example, from our data we can ascertain that a customer who likes to buy Basque women’s apparel also likes to purchase particular types of fragrance.

From this we are able to target different customer segments with relevant offers and communications. This is a more personalised way of giving our customers information that is meaningful. We are learning more about this every day and have conducted several trials measuring results.’

Neil Lawrence, Chief Executive Officer, Lawrence Creative Strategy

‘Social media can dissolve barriers between marketers and people marketed to. It’s a useful tool if used correctly. It allows a directness and immediacy of contact. The focus on my work has been political. The Kevin 07 election was the first digital election, although there was no Twitter.

However, people get very taken with a new medium. There used to be a creative arrogance about television, now there is an online arrogance, but you have to keep it in perspective. Mass media is still powerful. With Kevin 07, our most viewed YouTube video was 135,000 views. A well-placed television ad can still get two million views.

Yes, there are hundreds of new ways of sending out your message – but that can mean hundreds of new ways to waste your money.

The fundamentals stay the same: begin with no bias, work out your strategy, be clear about your message, then decide the most effective way of disseminating it.’

Ross McEwan, Group Executive, Retail Banking Services, Commonwealth Bank of Australia

‘We lead in technology in replacing our core banking system. The new system is based on flexibility. Flexibility will allow us to meet customer needs in terms of product solutions, and service offerings no matter how they emerge.

The key challenge will be teaching staff how to use the improved technology and customer management system to analyse requirements and package up appropriate solutions. Ensuring staff have the time to spend with customers to understand their financial needs will be a driver of success. The options they have today goes from a focus on product sales, say five products to fulfill the customers’ needs, to something that is not a product – but a range of feature options, tailored to each individual.

We focus distribution channels that fit how a customer wishes to interact with us, from a branch experience through to an online experience. Most branches have online banking facilities, so that staff can hand-hold customers through the process. However, we also offer a differentiated service offer to match customers’ needs. For example our Sydney University branch offers iPod and iPhone touch technology. We also match branch staff to the demographic of the customers in any given area.

We were one of first organisations to go online with a home loan product. I closed this down after we found most customers found the process too complex and they wanted to talk to someone. It’s the biggest financial transaction that many people do. A level of advice is needed.

There is a generation coming through that is more comfortable doing everything online, but it’s still interesting that a lot of people want to talk to somebody about their financial position.

We have a team of people working on making complex transactions simple, with tools like click-to-chat. We will make the transition over a long period of time, at the pace customers are willing to go.

In terms of the future, our focus will remain on the customer. The strategy is, first make it easy for customers to do business with us, second, focus on their needs not ours. Most of the answers we need are sitting right there with our customer’s needs and preferences.’

Matthew Ayres, Global Head of Strategy & Innovation, Lend Lease Corporation

‘Engaging in social media reduces business risk. Companies that are confident and willing to listen have access to a rich source of alternate views that may challenge huge parts of how they operate. To refuse to join the dialogue is to expose the business to future risk.

It’s an old world fixation on process (‘but this is the way we do things around here’) that prevents some businesses embracing challenging and fertile conversations with consumers. It used to be ‘process first, behaviour second’ but it’s time to flip the lens and think what are the new consumer behaviours and how can we change our processes to deliver to them?

This can be incredibly uncomfortable. When you truly interact with a customer and  allow them to influence the outcome, it means you don’t necessarily know what the outcome may be. Companies have a choice: become facilitators, mentors, trusted participants and embrace the uncertainty, or say, ‘It’s too much I want to keep control.’

The opportunity to experiment in business is the opportunity to learn what does and what doesn’t work. By its nature, experimenting means some failures, and large companies don’t always see failure as valuable. Indeed, it is traditionally penalised, yet the seeds of future success may well lie in the experiments.

Older generations argue, ‘I’ve have the answer from experience’. Younger generations counter ‘I have the answer from technology, and I know how this all works.’ Each is just as flawed as the other. It’s not about having an answer, it’s about deep listening: ‘I can hear the arguments and I can determine the underlying truths. Based on those I have the confidence to move forward.’

No social media? It’s catch up time

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

An unexpected puppy at Christmas is how governance blogger Chris Boudreaux sees social media. You didn’t ask for it, you’re not sure you really want it, you know it’ll turn your life upside down, run amok and leave mayhem in its wake. But puppies can be trained, so with ground rules and a bit of loving, you have the chance of a rich and rewarding relationship. After all, like it or not, the puppy is out of its gift box.

The tipping point has been reached as executives realise that social media interaction is inevitable. The relevance and value of social media to marketing is no longer the issue. Indeed, early adopters have already moved on, developing new and experimental applications for ‘social dialogue’ within their organisations. Any corners of corporate Australia that procrastinate will be playing catch up.

The value debate is over

One problem for many businesses is fear. Lack of control in business has always been perceived to be a bad thing. Social media interaction is difficult to control, especially now that it has spread beyond the marketing department, and the whole organisation is getting involved.

But control isn’t entirely the point. Participation is. Nonetheless some governance is appropriate. Just like any interaction, online or offline, clear rules of engagement can be established.

Guardrails, not guidelines

The trick is to introduce controls that don’t stifle the debate they’re trying to manage: you need guardrails not guidelines. Corporate governance when it comes to social media need be no more than a framework of sensitivity and common sense.

So, how can you build an effective, light-touch governance framework?

Build social media into the corporate outlook: the digital (marketing) strategy should ideally come from, or be sponsored by, senior management, with the aims woven into the corporate and business aspirations of a company.

Disseminate: once a strategy is agreed, its aims should be cascaded down the organisation, giving divisions autonomy over their conversations and outreach. Create an escalation process for issues before they happen and ensure you have online monitoring in place for references to your brand/name and the wider competitive environment.

Establish clear rules: create a set of guardrails for each major social media engagement (marketing campaigns, personal v private activity, use in HR, etc). Make sure there’s a sign-off process with corporate priorities clearly understood around the company. Try to encourage discussion with sensible guidance that doesn’t stifle advocates and evangelists who energise the online debate.

React and respond: even in a corporate framework and environment it’s possible to be fluid and organic in responding to situations. Take an agile approach to policy and controls, allowing guidelines and rules to develop alongside the channels which they are created for.

It’s never been as important to ‘keep it real’. And that doesn’t often come easily to rigorously structured matrix organisations. But, always remember that puppy you didn’t ask for? It was a pain in the **** at the outset, but you’d never be without now, would you?